GHSA-Q7W5-JVGC-GCF2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:45 – Updated: 2025-04-11 03:36
VLAI?
Details
The Cisco Content Services Switch (CSS) 11500 with software before 8.20.4.02 and the Application Control Engine (ACE) 4710 with software before A2(3.0) do not properly handle use of LF, CR, and LFCR as alternatives to the standard CRLF sequence between HTTP headers, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended header insertions or conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks via crafted header data, as demonstrated by LF characters preceding ClientCert-Subject and ClientCert-Subject-CN headers, aka Bug ID CSCta04885.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-1576"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-07-06T17:17:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The Cisco Content Services Switch (CSS) 11500 with software before 8.20.4.02 and the Application Control Engine (ACE) 4710 with software before A2(3.0) do not properly handle use of LF, CR, and LFCR as alternatives to the standard CRLF sequence between HTTP headers, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended header insertions or conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks via crafted header data, as demonstrated by LF characters preceding ClientCert-Subject and ClientCert-Subject-CN headers, aka Bug ID CSCta04885.",
"id": "GHSA-q7w5-jvgc-gcf2",
"modified": "2025-04-11T03:36:55Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:45:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-1576"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/66092"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1024167"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1024168"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/512144/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/41315"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vsecurity.com/resources/advisory/20100702-1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…