GHSA-Q863-CCHM-C6C6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-25 00:00 – Updated: 2022-03-30 20:34
VLAI?
Summary
SQL Injection in Fork CMS
Details
Fork CMS contains a SQL injection vulnerability in versions prior to version 5.11.1. When deleting submissions which belong to a formular (made with module FormBuilder), the parameter id[] is vulnerable to SQL injection.
Severity ?
7.5 (High)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "forkcms/forkcms"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.11.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-0153"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-89"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-03-29T20:36:57Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-03-24T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Fork CMS contains a SQL injection vulnerability in versions prior to version 5.11.1. When deleting submissions which belong to a formular (made with module `FormBuilder`), the parameter `id[]` is vulnerable to SQL injection.",
"id": "GHSA-q863-cchm-c6c6",
"modified": "2022-03-30T20:34:44Z",
"published": "2022-03-25T00:00:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-0153"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/forkcms/forkcms/commit/7a12046a67ae5d8cf04face3ee75e55f03a1a608"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/forkcms/forkcms"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://huntr.dev/bounties/841503dd-311c-470a-a8ec-d4579b3274eb"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "SQL Injection in Fork CMS"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…