GHSA-Q94Q-M26P-7MJ4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:46 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:46
VLAI?
Details
Memory leak in the TCP input module in Cisco IOS 12.2, 12.4, 15.0, 15.2, 15.3, and 15.4 and IOS XE 3.3.xXO, 3.5.xE, 3.6.xE, 3.8.xS through 3.10.xS before 3.10.5S, and 3.11.xS and 3.12.xS before 3.12.3S allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption or device reload) by sending crafted TCP packets over (1) IPv4 or (2) IPv6, aka Bug ID CSCum94811.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-0646"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-03-26T10:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Memory leak in the TCP input module in Cisco IOS 12.2, 12.4, 15.0, 15.2, 15.3, and 15.4 and IOS XE 3.3.xXO, 3.5.xE, 3.6.xE, 3.8.xS through 3.10.xS before 3.10.5S, and 3.11.xS and 3.12.xS before 3.12.3S allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption or device reload) by sending crafted TCP packets over (1) IPv4 or (2) IPv6, aka Bug ID CSCum94811.",
"id": "GHSA-q94q-m26p-7mj4",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:46:07Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:46:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-0646"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150325-tcpleak"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/73340"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031980"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…