GHSA-QC8F-5C3C-GPPM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:47 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:47
VLAI?
Details
IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.1, 7.5 and 7.6 could allow a remote attacker to hijack a user's session, caused by the failure to invalidate an existing session identifier. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain access to another user's session. IBM X-Force ID: 118537.
Severity ?
5.6 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-8924"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-04-26T17:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.1, 7.5 and 7.6 could allow a remote attacker to hijack a user\u0027s session, caused by the failure to invalidate an existing session identifier. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain access to another user\u0027s session. IBM X-Force ID: 118537.",
"id": "GHSA-qc8f-5c3c-gppm",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:47:18Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:47:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-8924"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21996256"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98023"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…