GHSA-QCC4-P59M-P54M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-12 14:21 – Updated: 2026-03-12 14:21Summary
A sandbox boundary-validation gap in symlink alias handling allowed certain workspace-only write paths to be treated as in-boundary even when they could resolve outside the workspace/sandbox root.
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package: npm
openclaw - Affected versions:
<= 2026.2.25 - Latest published npm version included in affected range:
2026.2.25(checked on February 26, 2026) - Patched version (pre-set for release):
2026.2.26
Technical Details
In affected versions, dangling symlink hops could be accepted during boundary checks under missing-target conditions. For workspace-only write flows (including apply_patch), this could allow writes to resolve outside the configured workspace/sandbox boundary.
The fix resolves symlink targets through existing ancestors and fails closed when canonical resolution escapes the configured boundary.
Impact
- Boundary-confined write operations could be redirected outside the configured workspace/sandbox root.
- Primary impact is integrity of host-side files reachable from that path resolution.
Fix Commit(s)
4fd29a35bb85a1898ebff518364c467058b50e14
Release Process Note
patched_versions is pre-set to the planned next release (2026.2.26) so once npm 2026.2.26 is published, the advisory can be published without further field edits.
Thanks @tdjackey for reporting.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2026.2.25"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.2.26"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-367",
"CWE-59"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-12T14:21:54Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\nA sandbox boundary-validation gap in symlink alias handling allowed certain workspace-only write paths to be treated as in-boundary even when they could resolve outside the workspace/sandbox root.\n\n### Affected Packages / Versions\n- Package: npm `openclaw`\n- Affected versions: `\u003c= 2026.2.25`\n- Latest published npm version included in affected range: `2026.2.25` (checked on February 26, 2026)\n- Patched version (pre-set for release): `2026.2.26`\n\n### Technical Details\nIn affected versions, dangling symlink hops could be accepted during boundary checks under missing-target conditions. For workspace-only write flows (including `apply_patch`), this could allow writes to resolve outside the configured workspace/sandbox boundary.\n\nThe fix resolves symlink targets through existing ancestors and fails closed when canonical resolution escapes the configured boundary.\n\n### Impact\n- Boundary-confined write operations could be redirected outside the configured workspace/sandbox root.\n- Primary impact is integrity of host-side files reachable from that path resolution.\n\n### Fix Commit(s)\n- `4fd29a35bb85a1898ebff518364c467058b50e14`\n\n### Release Process Note\n`patched_versions` is pre-set to the planned next release (`2026.2.26`) so once npm `2026.2.26` is published, the advisory can be published without further field edits.\n\nThanks @tdjackey for reporting.",
"id": "GHSA-qcc4-p59m-p54m",
"modified": "2026-03-12T14:21:54Z",
"published": "2026-03-12T14:21:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-qcc4-p59m-p54m"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/4fd29a35bb85a1898ebff518364c467058b50e14"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw: Sandbox dangling-symlink alias handling could bypass workspace-only write boundary"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.