GHSA-QF7V-8HJ3-4XW7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2020-05-06 19:41 – Updated: 2024-10-23 15:55
VLAI?
Summary
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in PySAML2
Details

PySAML2 before 5.0.0 does not check that the signature in a SAML document is enveloped and thus signature wrapping is effective, i.e., it is affected by XML Signature Wrapping (XSW). The signature information and the node/object that is signed can be in different places and thus the signature verification will succeed, but the wrong data will be used. This specifically affects the verification of assertions that have been signed.

Severity ?
7.5 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
8.7 (High)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "pysaml2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.0.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-5390"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2020-05-06T19:39:39Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-01-13T19:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "PySAML2 before 5.0.0 does not check that the signature in a SAML document is enveloped and thus signature wrapping is effective, i.e., it is affected by XML Signature Wrapping (XSW). The signature information and the node/object that is signed can be in different places and thus the signature verification will succeed, but the wrong data will be used. This specifically affects the verification of assertions that have been signed.",
  "id": "GHSA-qf7v-8hj3-4xw7",
  "modified": "2024-10-23T15:55:36Z",
  "published": "2020-05-06T19:41:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-5390"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/IdentityPython/pysaml2/commit/5e9d5acbcd8ae45c4e736ac521fd2df5b1c62e25"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/IdentityPython/pysaml2/commit/f27c7e7a7010f83380566a219fd6a290a00f2b6e"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/IdentityPython/pysaml2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/IdentityPython/pysaml2/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#500-2020-01-13"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/IdentityPython/pysaml2/releases"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/IdentityPython/pysaml2/releases/tag/v5.0.0"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qf7v-8hj3-4xw7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/pysaml2/PYSEC-2020-94.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/02/msg00025.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://pypi.org/project/pysaml2/5.0.0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4245-1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4630"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in PySAML2"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.