GHSA-QFMF-XG7V-F7X3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 07:25 – Updated: 2022-05-01 07:25
VLAI?
Details

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the administrative interface for the TeraStation HD-HTGL firmware 2.05 beta 1 and earlier allows remote attackers to modify configurations or delete arbitrary data via unspecified vectors.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2006-5175"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2006-10-10T04:06:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the administrative interface for the TeraStation HD-HTGL firmware 2.05 beta 1 and earlier allows remote attackers to modify configurations or delete arbitrary data via unspecified vectors.",
  "id": "GHSA-qfmf-xg7v-f7x3",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T07:25:50Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T07:25:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-5175"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/29338"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://jvn.jp/jp/JVN%2393484133/index.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22248"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/3891"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…