ghsa-qfr5-wjpw-q4c4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-06-19 00:00
Modified
2022-06-29 21:52
Severity ?
Summary
Denial of Service in python-ldap
Details
python-ldap before 3.4.0 is vulnerable to a denial of service when ldap.schema is used for untrusted schema definitions, because of a regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) flaw in the LDAP schema parser. By sending crafted regex input, a remote authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause a denial of service condition.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "python-ldap" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "3.4.0" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2021-46823" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-1333" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2022-06-20T22:36:32Z", "nvd_published_at": "2022-06-18T16:15:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "python-ldap before 3.4.0 is vulnerable to a denial of service when ldap.schema is used for untrusted schema definitions, because of a regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) flaw in the LDAP schema parser. By sending crafted regex input, a remote authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause a denial of service condition.", "id": "GHSA-qfr5-wjpw-q4c4", "modified": "2022-06-29T21:52:17Z", "published": "2022-06-19T00:00:21Z", "references": [ { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/python-ldap/python-ldap/security/advisories/GHSA-r8wq-qrxc-hmcm" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-46823" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/221507" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/python-ldap/python-ldap" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "Denial of Service in python-ldap" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.