ghsa-qg5v-7xq3-qwf4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:11
Modified
2022-05-17 03:11
Details

The SMB1 protocol implementation in Samba 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 does not recognize the "server signing = mandatory" setting, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SMB servers by modifying the client-server data stream.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-2114"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2016-04-25T00:59:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The SMB1 protocol implementation in Samba 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 does not recognize the \"server signing = mandatory\" setting, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SMB servers by modifying the client-server data stream.",
  "id": "GHSA-qg5v-7xq3-qwf4",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T03:11:47Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T03:11:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-2114"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa122"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-47"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.2.10.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.samba.org/samba/latest_news.html#4.4.2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2016-2114.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://badlock.org"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/182185.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/182272.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-April/182288.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00047.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-04/msg00048.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0612.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0614.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0618.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0620.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3548"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/86011"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035533"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security\u0026y=2016\u0026m=slackware-security.458012"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2950-1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2950-2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2950-3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2950-4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2950-5"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.