GHSA-QH2P-G6JP-838M

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:13 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:13
VLAI?
Details

Cisco TelePresence IX5000 8.0.3 stores a private key associated with an X.509 certificate under the web root with insufficient access control, which allows remote attackers to obtain cleartext versions of HTTPS traffic or spoof devices via a direct request to the certificate directory, aka Bug ID CSCuu63501.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-6276"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-09-05T02:59:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cisco TelePresence IX5000 8.0.3 stores a private key associated with an X.509 certificate under the web root with insufficient access control, which allows remote attackers to obtain cleartext versions of HTTPS traffic or spoof devices via a direct request to the certificate directory, aka Bug ID CSCuu63501.",
  "id": "GHSA-qh2p-g6jp-838m",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T03:13:41Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T03:13:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-6276"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=40727"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033477"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…