ghsa-qh5w-h894-x9jx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:12
Modified
2022-05-13 01:12
Details

The eepro100 emulator in QEMU qemu-kvm blank allows local guest users to cause a denial of service (application crash and infinite loop) via vectors involving the command block list.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-8345"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-04-13T17:59:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The eepro100 emulator in QEMU qemu-kvm blank allows local guest users to cause a denial of service (application crash and infinite loop) via vectors involving the command block list.",
  "id": "GHSA-qh5w-h894-x9jx",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:12:20Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:12:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-8345"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-10/msg03911.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201602-01"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3469"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3470"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3471"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/25/11"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/77985"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.