GHSA-QHMC-3MVR-F2J4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-15 15:30 – Updated: 2025-12-16 19:33
VLAI?
Summary
django-allauth does not reject access tokens for inactive users
Details
An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. IdP: marking a user as is_active=False after having handed tokens for that user while the account was still active had no effect. Fixed the access/refresh tokens are now rejected.
Severity ?
5.4 (Medium)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "django-allauth"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "65.13.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-65430"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-613"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-12-16T19:33:33Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-15T14:15:57Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. IdP: marking a user as is_active=False after having handed tokens for that user while the account was still active had no effect. Fixed the access/refresh tokens are now rejected.",
"id": "GHSA-qhmc-3mvr-f2j4",
"modified": "2025-12-16T19:33:33Z",
"published": "2025-12-15T15:30:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-65430"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pennersr/django-allauth/commit/39f4a4ce9c891795b00914ca5ec32de72d5369c0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pennersr/django-allauth/commit/c54edf947c5a1c8c4ff3cddb75c86000ecb2507d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://allauth.org/news/2025/10/django-allauth-65.13.0-released"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://codeberg.org/allauth/django-allauth"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "django-allauth does not reject access tokens for inactive users"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…