GHSA-QJ5F-M5RP-V884

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:52 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:52
VLAI?
Details

Buffer overflow in the WebClient ActiveX control in Siemens Tecnomatix FactoryLink 6.6.1 (aka 6.6 SP1), 7.5.217 (aka 7.5 SP2), and 8.0.2.54 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string in a parameter associated with the location URL.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-4055"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-01-08T00:55:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in the WebClient ActiveX control in Siemens Tecnomatix FactoryLink 6.6.1 (aka 6.6 SP1), 7.5.217 (aka 7.5 SP2), and 8.0.2.54 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string in a parameter associated with the location URL.",
  "id": "GHSA-qj5f-m5rp-v884",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T01:52:29Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T01:52:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-4055"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/72117"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/51266"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/control_systems/pdf/ICSA-11-343-01.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.usdata.com/sea/factorylink/en/p_nav5.asp"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…