GHSA-QM9F-HJ62-FCM2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-18 21:31 – Updated: 2025-03-18 21:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ubifs: rename_whiteout: Fix double free for whiteout_ui->data

'whiteout_ui->data' will be freed twice if space budget fail for rename whiteout operation as following process:

rename_whiteout dev = kmalloc whiteout_ui->data = dev kfree(whiteout_ui->data) // Free first time iput(whiteout) ubifs_free_inode kfree(ui->data) // Double free!

KASAN reports:

BUG: KASAN: double-free or invalid-free in ubifs_free_inode+0x4f/0x70 Call Trace: kfree+0x117/0x490 ubifs_free_inode+0x4f/0x70 [ubifs] i_callback+0x30/0x60 rcu_do_batch+0x366/0xac0 __do_softirq+0x133/0x57f

Allocated by task 1506: kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x3c2/0x7a0 do_rename+0x9b7/0x1150 [ubifs] ubifs_rename+0x106/0x1f0 [ubifs] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80

Freed by task 1506: kfree+0x117/0x490 do_rename.cold+0x53/0x8a [ubifs] ubifs_rename+0x106/0x1f0 [ubifs] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80

The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88810238bed8 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8 of size 8 ==================================================================

Let ubifs_free_inode() free 'whiteout_ui->data'. BTW, delete unused assignment 'whiteout_ui->data_len = 0', process 'ubifs_evict_inode() -> ubifs_jnl_delete_inode() -> ubifs_jnl_write_inode()' doesn't need it (because 'inc_nlink(whiteout)' won't be excuted by 'goto out_release', and the nlink of whiteout inode is 0).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-47638"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-415"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-26T06:37:05Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nubifs: rename_whiteout: Fix double free for whiteout_ui-\u003edata\n\n\u0027whiteout_ui-\u003edata\u0027 will be freed twice if space budget fail for\nrename whiteout operation as following process:\n\nrename_whiteout\n  dev = kmalloc\n  whiteout_ui-\u003edata = dev\n  kfree(whiteout_ui-\u003edata)  // Free first time\n  iput(whiteout)\n    ubifs_free_inode\n      kfree(ui-\u003edata)\t    // Double free!\n\nKASAN reports:\n==================================================================\nBUG: KASAN: double-free or invalid-free in ubifs_free_inode+0x4f/0x70\nCall Trace:\n  kfree+0x117/0x490\n  ubifs_free_inode+0x4f/0x70 [ubifs]\n  i_callback+0x30/0x60\n  rcu_do_batch+0x366/0xac0\n  __do_softirq+0x133/0x57f\n\nAllocated by task 1506:\n  kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x3c2/0x7a0\n  do_rename+0x9b7/0x1150 [ubifs]\n  ubifs_rename+0x106/0x1f0 [ubifs]\n  do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80\n\nFreed by task 1506:\n  kfree+0x117/0x490\n  do_rename.cold+0x53/0x8a [ubifs]\n  ubifs_rename+0x106/0x1f0 [ubifs]\n  do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80\n\nThe buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88810238bed8 which\nbelongs to the cache kmalloc-8 of size 8\n==================================================================\n\nLet ubifs_free_inode() free \u0027whiteout_ui-\u003edata\u0027. BTW, delete unused\nassignment \u0027whiteout_ui-\u003edata_len = 0\u0027, process \u0027ubifs_evict_inode()\n-\u003e ubifs_jnl_delete_inode() -\u003e ubifs_jnl_write_inode()\u0027 doesn\u0027t need it\n(because \u0027inc_nlink(whiteout)\u0027 won\u0027t be excuted by \u0027goto out_release\u0027,\n and the nlink of whiteout inode is 0).",
  "id": "GHSA-qm9f-hj62-fcm2",
  "modified": "2025-03-18T21:31:58Z",
  "published": "2025-03-18T21:31:58Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47638"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14276d38c89a170363e90b6ac0a53c3cf61b87fc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ad07009c459e56ebdcc089d850d664660fdb742"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b3236ecf96db7af5836e1366ce39ace8ce832fa"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/40a8f0d5e7b3999f096570edab71c345da812e3e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6d7a158a7363c1f6604aa47ae1a280a5c65123dd"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8b3c7be16f3f4dfd6e15ac651484e59d3fa36274"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a90e2dbe66d2647ff95a0442ad2e86482d977fd8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b9a937f096e608b3368c1abc920d4d640ba2c94f"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…