ghsa-qmmw-8mm8-4p5g
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:34
Modified
2022-05-17 03:34
Details

Heap-based buffer overflow in the encode_slice function in libavcodec/proresenc_kostya.c in FFMpeg before 1.1.14, 1.2.x before 1.2.8, 2.x before 2.2.7, and 2.3.x before 2.3.3 and Libav before 10.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2014-5271"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-11-03T16:55:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the encode_slice function in libavcodec/proresenc_kostya.c in FFMpeg before 1.1.14, 1.2.x before 1.2.8, 2.x before 2.2.7, and 2.3.x before 2.3.3 and Libav before 10.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.",
  "id": "GHSA-qmmw-8mm8-4p5g",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T03:34:41Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T03:34:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-5271"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201603-06"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.ffmpeg.org/security.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=commit;h=52b81ff4635c077b2bc8b8d3637d933b6629d803"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/111725"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/69250"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.