ghsa-qq3j-44gw-cf6r
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-07-30 00:00
Modified
2022-08-10 15:41
Summary
Eclipse Californium denial of service (DoS) via Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) handshake on parameter mismatch
Details

In Eclipse Californium versions 2.0.0 to 2.7.2 and 3.0.0-3.5.0 a DTLS resumption handshake falls back to a DTLS full handshake on a parameter mismatch without using a HelloVerifyRequest. Especially, if used with certificate based cipher suites, that results in message amplification (DDoS other peers) and high CPU load (DoS own peer). The misbehavior occurs only with DTLS_VERIFY_PEERS_ON_RESUMPTION_THRESHOLD values larger than 0.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [
      {
         database_specific: {
            last_known_affected_version_range: "<= 2.7.2",
         },
         package: {
            ecosystem: "Maven",
            name: "org.eclipse.californium:californium-core",
         },
         ranges: [
            {
               events: [
                  {
                     introduced: "2.0.0",
                  },
                  {
                     fixed: "2.7.3",
                  },
               ],
               type: "ECOSYSTEM",
            },
         ],
      },
      {
         database_specific: {
            last_known_affected_version_range: "<= 3.5.0",
         },
         package: {
            ecosystem: "Maven",
            name: "org.eclipse.californium:californium-core",
         },
         ranges: [
            {
               events: [
                  {
                     introduced: "3.0.0",
                  },
                  {
                     fixed: "3.6.0",
                  },
               ],
               type: "ECOSYSTEM",
            },
         ],
      },
   ],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2022-2576",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-408",
      ],
      github_reviewed: true,
      github_reviewed_at: "2022-08-10T15:41:24Z",
      nvd_published_at: "2022-07-29T14:15:00Z",
      severity: "HIGH",
   },
   details: "In Eclipse Californium versions 2.0.0 to 2.7.2 and 3.0.0-3.5.0 a DTLS resumption handshake falls back to a DTLS full handshake on a parameter mismatch without using a HelloVerifyRequest. Especially, if used with certificate based cipher suites, that results in message amplification (DDoS other peers) and high CPU load (DoS own peer). The misbehavior occurs only with DTLS_VERIFY_PEERS_ON_RESUMPTION_THRESHOLD values larger than 0.",
   id: "GHSA-qq3j-44gw-cf6r",
   modified: "2022-08-10T15:41:24Z",
   published: "2022-07-30T00:00:35Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-2576",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/eclipse-californium/californium/pull/2039",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/eclipse-californium/californium/commit/0cc953a1dc071efc960130e229fcb4f8bda7f9df",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/eclipse-californium/californium/commit/8373db84b2d07f22c39ffc333ab881dba9401722",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bugs.eclipse.org/580018",
      },
      {
         type: "PACKAGE",
         url: "https://github.com/eclipse/californium",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
   summary: "Eclipse Californium denial of service (DoS) via Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) handshake on parameter mismatch",
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.