GHSA-QQWR-J9MM-FHW6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-25 19:34 – Updated: 2024-11-25 21:46
VLAI?
Summary
deno_doc's HTML generator vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting
Details

Summary

Several cross-site scripting vulnerabilities existed in the deno_doc crate which lead to Self-XSS with deno doc --html.

Details & PoC

1.) XSS in generated search_index.js

deno_doc outputed a JavaScript file for searching. However, the generated file used innerHTML on unsanitzed HTML input.

https://github.com/denoland/deno_doc/blob/dc556c848831d7ae48f3eff2ababc6e75eb6b73e/src/html/templates/pages/search.js#L120-L144

2.) XSS via property, method and enum names

deno_doc did not sanitize property names, method names and enum names.

Impact

The first XSS most likely didn't have an impact since deno doc --html is expected to be used locally with own packages.

Severity ?
5.4 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
2.0 (Low)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:P
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "deno_doc"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.119.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-32468"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-11-25T19:34:24Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-11-25T19:15:09Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nSeveral cross-site scripting vulnerabilities existed in the `deno_doc` crate which lead to Self-XSS with `deno doc --html`.\n\n### Details \u0026 PoC\n\n1.) XSS in generated `search_index.js`\n\n`deno_doc` outputed a JavaScript file for searching. However, the generated file used `innerHTML` on unsanitzed HTML input.\n\nhttps://github.com/denoland/deno_doc/blob/dc556c848831d7ae48f3eff2ababc6e75eb6b73e/src/html/templates/pages/search.js#L120-L144\n\n2.) XSS via property, method and enum names\n\n`deno_doc` did not sanitize property names, method names and enum names.\n\n### Impact\n\nThe first XSS most likely didn\u0027t have an impact since `deno doc --html` is expected to be used locally with own packages.",
  "id": "GHSA-qqwr-j9mm-fhw6",
  "modified": "2024-11-25T21:46:50Z",
  "published": "2024-11-25T19:34:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/denoland/deno/security/advisories/GHSA-qqwr-j9mm-fhw6"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-32468"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/denoland/deno_doc/commit/0f1ef3efbf16194730a29d93dcb9c02f6c490942"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/denoland/deno"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/denoland/deno_doc/blob/dc556c848831d7ae48f3eff2ababc6e75eb6b73e/src/html/templates/pages/search.js#L120-L144"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:P",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "deno_doc\u0027s HTML generator vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.