ghsa-qrcx-p4rr-g48h
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 02:31
Modified
2023-09-18 23:51
Summary
Apache Tomcat allows remote attackers to read JSP source files
Details
The HTTP/1.1 connector in Apache Tomcat 4.1.15 through 4.1.40 does not reject NULL bytes in a URL when allowLinking is configured, which allows remote attackers to read JSP source files and obtain sensitive information.
{ affected: [ { package: { ecosystem: "Maven", name: "org.apache.tomcat:tomcat", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "4.1.15", }, { last_affected: "4.1.40", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2005-4836", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-200", ], github_reviewed: true, github_reviewed_at: "2023-09-18T23:51:34Z", nvd_published_at: "2005-12-31T05:00:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "The HTTP/1.1 connector in Apache Tomcat 4.1.15 through 4.1.40 does not reject NULL bytes in a URL when allowLinking is configured, which allows remote attackers to read JSP source files and obtain sensitive information.", id: "GHSA-qrcx-p4rr-g48h", modified: "2023-09-18T23:51:34Z", published: "2022-05-01T02:31:23Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-4836", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/29dc6c2b625789e70a9c4756b5a327e6547273ff8bde7e0327af48c5@%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c62b0e3a7bf23342352a5810c640a94b6db69957c5c19db507004d74@%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb71997f506c6cc8b530dd845c084995a9878098846c7b4eacfae8db3@%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://tomcat.apache.org/security-4.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/28483", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], summary: "Apache Tomcat allows remote attackers to read JSP source files", }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.