GHSA-QV62-XFJ6-32XM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 00:16 – Updated: 2023-05-04 21:14
VLAI
Summary
RubyGems Improper Input Validation vulnerability
Details
RubyGems 2.0.x before 2.0.17, 2.2.x before 2.2.5, and 2.3.x before 2.4.8 does not validate the hostname when fetching gems or making API requests, which allows remote attackers to redirect requests to arbitrary domains via a crafted DNS SRV record with a domain that is suffixed with the original domain name, aka a "DNS hijack attack."
NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2015-3900.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "rubygems-update"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.0.17"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "rubygems-update"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.1.0.rc.1"
},
{
"fixed": "2.2.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "rubygems-update"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.3.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.4.8"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-4020"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-05-04T21:14:40Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2015-08-25T17:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "RubyGems 2.0.x before 2.0.17, 2.2.x before 2.2.5, and 2.3.x before 2.4.8 does not validate the hostname when fetching gems or making API requests, which allows remote attackers to redirect requests to arbitrary domains via a crafted DNS SRV record with a domain that is suffixed with the original domain name, aka a \"DNS hijack attack.\"\n\nNOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2015-3900.",
"id": "GHSA-qv62-xfj6-32xm",
"modified": "2023-05-04T21:14:40Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T00:16:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-4020"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/5c7bfb5"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rubygems-update/CVE-2015-4020.yml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://puppet.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-3900"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20200228084212/http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75431"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20200228085830/https://puppet.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-3900"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.trustwave.com/Resources/Security-Advisories/Advisories/TWSL2015-009/?fid=6478"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.trustwave.com/Resources/SpiderLabs-Blog/Attacking-Ruby-Gem-Security-with-CVE-2015-3900"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://blog.rubygems.org/2015/06/08/2.2.5-released.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://blog.rubygems.org/2015/06/08/2.4.8-released.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinoct2015-2511968.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75431"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "RubyGems Improper Input Validation vulnerability"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…