GHSA-QVM2-XC63-59FM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:16 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:41
VLAI?
Details
SAPCRYPTOLIB before 5.555.38, SAPSECULIB, and CommonCryptoLib before 8.4.30, as used in SAP NetWeaver AS for ABAP and SAP HANA, allows remote attackers to spoof Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA) signatures via unspecified vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-8587"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-11-04T15:55:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "SAPCRYPTOLIB before 5.555.38, SAPSECULIB, and CommonCryptoLib before 8.4.30, as used in SAP NetWeaver AS for ABAP and SAP HANA, allows remote attackers to spoof Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA) signatures via unspecified vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-qvm2-xc63-59fm",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:41:30Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:16:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-8587"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://twitter.com/SAP_Gsupport/status/522401681997570048"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://blog.onapsis.com/sap-security-note-2067859-potential-exposure-to-digital-signature-spoofing"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/57606"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/2067859"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…