GHSA-QVXC-3HM6-C42Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:08 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:08
VLAI?
Details
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in concrete5 5.7.2.1, 5.7.2, and earlier allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) gName parameter in single_pages/dashboard/users/groups/bulkupdate.php or (2) instance_id parameter in tools/dashboard/sitemap_drag_request.php.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-9526"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-01-05T21:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in concrete5 5.7.2.1, 5.7.2, and earlier allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) gName parameter in single_pages/dashboard/users/groups/bulkupdate.php or (2) instance_id parameter in tools/dashboard/sitemap_drag_request.php.",
"id": "GHSA-qvxc-3hm6-c42q",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:08:37Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:08:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-9526"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/99264"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://morxploit.com/morxploits/morxconxss.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/129446/Concrete5-CMS-5.7.2-5.7.2.1-Cross-Site-Scripting.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Dec/38"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/534189/100/0/threaded"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…