ghsa-qw6j-h2x2-j7fj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:48
Modified
2022-05-17 05:48
Details

The OpenID module in Drupal 6.x before 6.18, and the OpenID module 5.x before 5.x-1.4 for Drupal, violates the OpenID 2.0 protocol by not checking for reuse of openid.response_nonce values, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by leveraging an assertion from an OpenID provider.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2010-3685"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-287"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2010-09-29T17:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The OpenID module in Drupal 6.x before 6.18, and the OpenID module 5.x before 5.x-1.4 for Drupal, violates the OpenID 2.0 protocol by not checking for reuse of openid.response_nonce values, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by leveraging an assertion from an OpenID provider.",
  "id": "GHSA-qw6j-h2x2-j7fj",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T05:48:00Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:48:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-3685"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://drupal.org/node/880476"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://drupal.org/node/880480"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=128418560705305\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=128440896914512\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2113"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/42388"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.