GHSA-QWGM-MXM4-3Q2C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 22:01 – Updated: 2023-01-24 16:02
VLAI?
Summary
net-ldap has weak salt when generating passwords
Details
The Ruby net-ldap gem before 0.16.2 uses a weak salt when generating SSHA passwords.
Severity ?
5.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "net-ldap"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.16.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-0083"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-916"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-01-24T16:02:54Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2019-11-21T14:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Ruby net-ldap gem before 0.16.2 uses a weak salt when generating SSHA passwords.",
"id": "GHSA-qwgm-mxm4-3q2c",
"modified": "2023-01-24T16:02:54Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T22:01:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-0083"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ruby-ldap/ruby-net-ldap/commit/b412ca05f6b430eaa1ce97ac95885b4cf187b04a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2014-0083"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2014-0083"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/ruby-ldap/ruby-net-ldap"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-0083"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "net-ldap has weak salt when generating passwords"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…