GHSA-QWRM-23W5-G55V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-09 09:33 – Updated: 2025-11-12 21:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nfsd: decrease sc_count directly if fail to queue dl_recall

A deadlock warning occurred when invoking nfs4_put_stid following a failed dl_recall queue operation: T1 T2 nfs4_laundromat nfs4_get_client_reaplist nfs4_anylock_blockers __break_lease spin_lock // ctx->flc_lock spin_lock // clp->cl_lock nfs4_lockowner_has_blockers locks_owner_has_blockers spin_lock // flctx->flc_lock nfsd_break_deleg_cb nfsd_break_one_deleg nfs4_put_stid refcount_dec_and_lock spin_lock // clp->cl_lock

When a file is opened, an nfs4_delegation is allocated with sc_count initialized to 1, and the file_lease holds a reference to the delegation. The file_lease is then associated with the file through kernel_setlease.

The disassociation is performed in nfsd4_delegreturn via the following call chain: nfsd4_delegreturn --> destroy_delegation --> destroy_unhashed_deleg --> nfs4_unlock_deleg_lease --> kernel_setlease --> generic_delete_lease The corresponding sc_count reference will be released after this disassociation.

Since nfsd_break_one_deleg executes while holding the flc_lock, the disassociation process becomes blocked when attempting to acquire flc_lock in generic_delete_lease. This means: 1) sc_count in nfsd_break_one_deleg will not be decremented to 0; 2) The nfs4_put_stid called by nfsd_break_one_deleg will not attempt to acquire cl_lock; 3) Consequently, no deadlock condition is created.

Given that sc_count in nfsd_break_one_deleg remains non-zero, we can safely perform refcount_dec on sc_count directly. This approach effectively avoids triggering deadlock warnings.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-37871"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-05-09T07:16:08Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnfsd: decrease sc_count directly if fail to queue dl_recall\n\nA deadlock warning occurred when invoking nfs4_put_stid following a failed\ndl_recall queue operation:\n            T1                            T2\n                                nfs4_laundromat\n                                 nfs4_get_client_reaplist\n                                  nfs4_anylock_blockers\n__break_lease\n spin_lock // ctx-\u003eflc_lock\n                                   spin_lock // clp-\u003ecl_lock\n                                   nfs4_lockowner_has_blockers\n                                    locks_owner_has_blockers\n                                     spin_lock // flctx-\u003eflc_lock\n nfsd_break_deleg_cb\n  nfsd_break_one_deleg\n   nfs4_put_stid\n    refcount_dec_and_lock\n     spin_lock // clp-\u003ecl_lock\n\nWhen a file is opened, an nfs4_delegation is allocated with sc_count\ninitialized to 1, and the file_lease holds a reference to the delegation.\nThe file_lease is then associated with the file through kernel_setlease.\n\nThe disassociation is performed in nfsd4_delegreturn via the following\ncall chain:\nnfsd4_delegreturn --\u003e destroy_delegation --\u003e destroy_unhashed_deleg --\u003e\nnfs4_unlock_deleg_lease --\u003e kernel_setlease --\u003e generic_delete_lease\nThe corresponding sc_count reference will be released after this\ndisassociation.\n\nSince nfsd_break_one_deleg executes while holding the flc_lock, the\ndisassociation process becomes blocked when attempting to acquire flc_lock\nin generic_delete_lease. This means:\n1) sc_count in nfsd_break_one_deleg will not be decremented to 0;\n2) The nfs4_put_stid called by nfsd_break_one_deleg will not attempt to\nacquire cl_lock;\n3) Consequently, no deadlock condition is created.\n\nGiven that sc_count in nfsd_break_one_deleg remains non-zero, we can\nsafely perform refcount_dec on sc_count directly. This approach\neffectively avoids triggering deadlock warnings.",
  "id": "GHSA-qwrm-23w5-g55v",
  "modified": "2025-11-12T21:31:02Z",
  "published": "2025-05-09T09:33:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37871"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14985d66b9b99c12995dd99d1c6c8dec4114c2a5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7d192e27a431026c58d60edf66dc6cd98d0c01fc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1d14d931bf700c1025db8c46d6731aa5cf440f9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a70832d3555987035fc430ccd703acd89393eadb"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a7fce086f6ca84db409b9d58493ea77c1978897c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b9bbe8f9d5663311d06667ce36d6ed255ead1a26"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ba903539fff745d592d893c71b30e5e268a95413"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00030.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00045.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…