GHSA-QXJH-RMR9-893R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 01:52 – Updated: 2025-04-03 04:10
VLAI?
Details
Multiple buffer overflows in Cain & Abel before 2.67 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via (1) an IKE packet with a large ID field that is not properly handled by the PSK sniffer filter, (2) the HTTP sniffer filter, or the (3) POP3, (4) SMTP, (5) IMAP, (6) NNTP, or (7) TDS sniffer filters.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-0807"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-05-02T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple buffer overflows in Cain \u0026 Abel before 2.67 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via (1) an IKE packet with a large ID field that is not properly handled by the PSK sniffer filter, (2) the HTTP sniffer filter, or the (3) POP3, (4) SMTP, (5) IMAP, (6) NNTP, or (7) TDS sniffer filters.",
"id": "GHSA-qxjh-rmr9-893r",
"modified": "2025-04-03T04:10:58Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T01:52:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-0807"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/19742"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/19744"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=111116097313427\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/14630"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1013476"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.oxid.it"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12840"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…