GHSA-R2PG-W96P-PCPJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:40 – Updated: 2023-07-31 19:39
VLAI?
Summary
ws-xmlrpc DoS Vulnerability
Details
The Content-Encoding HTTP header feature in ws-xmlrpc 3.1.3 as used in Apache Archiva allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption) by decompressing a large file containing zeroes.
Severity ?
6.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.xmlrpc:xmlrpc-common"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "3.1.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-5004"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-400"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-07-31T19:39:55Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2017-06-06T18:29:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Content-Encoding HTTP header feature in ws-xmlrpc 3.1.3 as used in Apache Archiva allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption) by decompressing a large file containing zeroes.",
"id": "GHSA-r2pg-w96p-pcpj",
"modified": "2023-07-31T19:39:55Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:40:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-5004"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/0ang3el/unsafe-xmlrpc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20160716070844/http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036294"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20171111065719/http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91736"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20171114185236/https://0ang3el.blogspot.in/2016/07/beware-of-ws-xmlrpc-library-in-your.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/07/12/5"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "ws-xmlrpc DoS Vulnerability"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…