GHSA-R358-8J8X-6JHW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:16 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:16
VLAI?
Details
Qemu has a Buffer Overflow in rtl8139_do_receive in hw/net/rtl8139.c because an incorrect integer data type is used.
Severity ?
7.5 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-17958"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-190"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-10-09T22:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Qemu has a Buffer Overflow in rtl8139_do_receive in hw/net/rtl8139.c because an incorrect integer data type is used.",
"id": "GHSA-r358-8j8x-6jhw",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:16:20Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:16:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-17958"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2425"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2553"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/01/msg00023.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-09/msg03269.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/May/76"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3826-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4454"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/10/08/1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105556"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…