GHSA-R38F-V7C5-GRVH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 07:45 – Updated: 2022-05-01 07:45
VLAI?
Details
The version of Sendmail 8.13.1-2 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Update 4 and earlier does not reject the "localhost.localdomain" domain name for e-mail messages that come from external hosts, which might allow remote attackers to spoof messages.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-7176"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-03-27T23:19:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The version of Sendmail 8.13.1-2 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Update 4 and earlier does not reject the \"localhost.localdomain\" domain name for e-mail messages that come from external hosts, which might allow remote attackers to spoof messages.",
"id": "GHSA-r38f-v7c5-grvh",
"modified": "2022-05-01T07:45:23Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T07:45:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-7176"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171838"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11499"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/25098"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/25743"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://support.avaya.com/elmodocs2/security/ASA-2007-248.htm"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2007-0252.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23742"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…