GHSA-R3M5-GW4V-CCV9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:13 – Updated: 2025-04-03 04:17
VLAI?
Details

Stack-based buffer overflow in AhnLab V3Pro 2004 build 6.0.0.383, V3 VirusBlock 2005 build 6.0.0.383, and V3Net for Windows Server 6.0 build 6.0.0.383 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filname in an ACE archive.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-3029"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-09-21T22:03:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in AhnLab V3Pro 2004 build 6.0.0.383, V3 VirusBlock 2005 build 6.0.0.383, and V3Net for Windows Server 6.0 build 6.0.0.383 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filname in an ACE archive.",
  "id": "GHSA-r3m5-gw4v-ccv9",
  "modified": "2025-04-03T04:17:43Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T02:13:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-3029"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://info.ahnlab.com/english/advisory/01.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=112680062609377\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/15674"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2005-17/advisory"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14844"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…