ghsa-r4v9-3hv9-pr4f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:09
Modified
2022-05-17 05:09
Details
The TIFFReadDirectory function in LibTIFF 3.9.0 does not properly validate the data types of codec-specific tags that have an out-of-order position in a TIFF file, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted file, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-2481.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2010-2630" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2010-07-06T17:17:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The TIFFReadDirectory function in LibTIFF 3.9.0 does not properly validate the data types of codec-specific tags that have an out-of-order position in a TIFF file, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted file, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-2481.", "id": "GHSA-r4v9-3hv9-pr4f", "modified": "2022-05-17T05:09:44Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:09:44Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-2630" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554371" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2210" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50726" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201209-02.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2552" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.