GHSA-R65M-RPW4-4W3F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:51 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:51
VLAI?
Details
The StartServiceCtrlDispatcher function in the cvpnd service (cvpnd.exe) in Cisco VPN client for Windows before 5.0.06.0100 does not properly handle an ERROR_FAILED_SERVICE_CONTROLLER_CONNECT error, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (service crash and VPN connection loss) via a manual start of cvpnd.exe while the cvpnd service is running.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-4118"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-12-01T00:30:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "The StartServiceCtrlDispatcher function in the cvpnd service (cvpnd.exe) in Cisco VPN client for Windows before 5.0.06.0100 does not properly handle an ERROR_FAILED_SERVICE_CONTROLLER_CONNECT error, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (service crash and VPN connection loss) via a manual start of cvpnd.exe while the cvpnd service is running.",
"id": "GHSA-r65m-rpw4-4w3f",
"modified": "2022-05-02T03:51:52Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:51:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-4118"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.org/0911-exploits/sybsec-adv17.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/37419"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=19445"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/37077"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/3296"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…