GHSA-R6F8-VRM4-59CH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:31 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:39
VLAI?
Details
The file comment feature in Rejetto HTTP File Server (hfs) 2.3c and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by uploading a file with certain invalid UTF-8 byte sequences that are interpreted as executable macro symbols.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-7226"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-10-10T01:55:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The file comment feature in Rejetto HTTP File Server (hfs) 2.3c and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by uploading a file with certain invalid UTF-8 byte sequences that are interpreted as executable macro symbols.",
"id": "GHSA-r6f8-vrm4-59ch",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:39:29Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:31:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-7226"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/128532/HTTP-File-Server-2.3a-2.3b-2.3c-Remote-Command-Execution.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34852"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.rejetto.com/forum/hfs-~-http-file-server/new-version-2-3d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/70216"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…