ghsa-r6h6-26c6-pwfv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 19:03
Modified
2022-05-24 19:03
Details

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in FortiProxy physical appliance CLI 2.0.0 to 2.0.1, 1.2.0 to 1.2.9, 1.1.0 to 1.1.6, 1.0.0 to 1.0.7 may allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform a Denial of Service attack by running the diagnose sys cpuset with a large cpuset mask value. Fortinet is not aware of any successful exploitation of this vulnerability that would lead to code execution.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-22130"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-06-03T11:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in FortiProxy physical appliance CLI 2.0.0 to 2.0.1, 1.2.0 to 1.2.9, 1.1.0 to 1.1.6, 1.0.0 to 1.0.7 may allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform a Denial of Service attack by running the `diagnose sys cpuset` with a large cpuset mask value. Fortinet is not aware of any successful exploitation of this vulnerability that would lead to code execution.",
  "id": "GHSA-r6h6-26c6-pwfv",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T19:03:59Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:03:59Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-22130"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-21-006"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.