GHSA-R6M9-5PWQ-JFM2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfs: use nfsi->rwsem to protect traversal of the file lock list
Lingfeng identified a bug and suggested two solutions, but both appear to have issues.
Generally, we cannot release flc_lock while iterating over the file lock list to avoid use-after-free (UAF) problems with file locks. However, functions like nfs_delegation_claim_locks and nfs4_reclaim_locks cannot adhere to this rule because recover_lock or nfs4_lock_delegation_recall may take a long time. To resolve this, NFS switches to using nfsi->rwsem for the same protection, and nfs_reclaim_locks follows this approach. Although nfs_delegation_claim_locks uses so_delegreturn_mutex instead, this is inadequate since a single inode can have multiple nfs4_state instances. Therefore, the fix is to also use nfsi->rwsem in this case.
Furthermore, after commit c69899a17ca4 ("NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range lock must be atomic with the stateid update"), the functions nfs4_locku_done and nfs4_lock_done also break this rule because they call locks_lock_inode_wait without holding nfsi->rwsem. Simply adding this protection could cause many deadlocks, so instead, the call to locks_lock_inode_wait is moved into _nfs4_proc_setlk. Regarding the bug fixed by commit c69899a17ca4 ("NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range lock must be atomic with the stateid update"), it has been resolved after commit 0460253913e5 ("NFSv4: nfs4_do_open() is incorrectly triggering state recovery") because all slots are drained before calling nfs4_do_reclaim, which prevents concurrent stateid changes along this path. Also, nfs_delegation_claim_locks does not cause this concurrency either since when _nfs4_proc_setlk is called with NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, no RPC is sent, so nfs4_lock_done is not called. Therefore, nfs4_lock_delegation_recall from nfs_delegation_claim_locks is the first time the stateid is set.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-72472"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:22:21Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnfs: use nfsi-\u003erwsem to protect traversal of the file lock list\n\nLingfeng identified a bug and suggested two solutions, but both appear\nto have issues.\n\nGenerally, we cannot release flc_lock while iterating over the file lock\nlist to avoid use-after-free (UAF) problems with file locks. However,\nfunctions like nfs_delegation_claim_locks and nfs4_reclaim_locks cannot\nadhere to this rule because recover_lock or nfs4_lock_delegation_recall\nmay take a long time. To resolve this, NFS switches to using nfsi-\u003erwsem\nfor the same protection, and nfs_reclaim_locks follows this approach.\nAlthough nfs_delegation_claim_locks uses so_delegreturn_mutex instead,\nthis is inadequate since a single inode can have multiple nfs4_state\ninstances. Therefore, the fix is to also use nfsi-\u003erwsem in this case.\n\nFurthermore, after commit c69899a17ca4 (\"NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range\nlock must be atomic with the stateid update\"), the functions\nnfs4_locku_done and nfs4_lock_done also break this rule because they\ncall locks_lock_inode_wait without holding nfsi-\u003erwsem. Simply adding\nthis protection could cause many deadlocks, so instead, the call to\nlocks_lock_inode_wait is moved into _nfs4_proc_setlk. Regarding the bug\nfixed by commit c69899a17ca4 (\"NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range\nlock must be atomic with the stateid update\"), it has been resolved\nafter commit 0460253913e5 (\"NFSv4: nfs4_do_open() is incorrectly triggering\nstate recovery\") because all slots are drained before calling\nnfs4_do_reclaim, which prevents concurrent stateid changes along this path.\nAlso, nfs_delegation_claim_locks does not cause this concurrency either\nsince when _nfs4_proc_setlk is called with NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, no RPC is\nsent, so nfs4_lock_done is not called. Therefore,\nnfs4_lock_delegation_recall from nfs_delegation_claim_locks is the first\ntime the stateid is set.",
"id": "GHSA-r6m9-5pwq-jfm2",
"modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:31Z",
"published": "2026-08-15T06:32:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72472"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1cda95bf2e9c0e6b63545b7565fe4a1e474322f4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4837fb36219e6c08b666bc31a86841bad8526358"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e68035178e65e2b3aa386ce61202ff33724ae418"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f161ef7b0dd2f51fdb002ba4a4e9bf0ee7409218"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.