ghsa-r7hf-97hq-qr83
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:47
Modified
2022-05-17 03:47
Details

Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) 8.5(x) and 8.6(x) before 8.6(2a)su3 and 9.x before 9.1(1) does not properly restrict the rate of SIP packets, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory and CPU consumption, and service disruption) via a flood of UDP packets to port 5060, aka Bug ID CSCub35869.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-3461"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2013-08-25T03:27:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) 8.5(x) and 8.6(x) before 8.6(2a)su3 and 9.x before 9.1(1) does not properly restrict the rate of SIP packets, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory and CPU consumption, and service disruption) via a flood of UDP packets to port 5060, aka Bug ID CSCub35869.",
  "id": "GHSA-r7hf-97hq-qr83",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T03:47:35Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T03:47:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-3461"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20130821-cucm"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1028938"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.