ghsa-r8fv-8gwf-v44c
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 06:54
Modified
2022-05-01 06:54
Details
fold_binary in fold-const.c in GNU Compiler Collection (gcc) 4.1 improperly handles pointer overflow when folding a certain expr comparison to a corresponding offset comparison in cases other than EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR, which might introduce buffer overflow vulnerabilities into applications that could be exploited by context-dependent attackers.NOTE: the vendor states that the essence of the issue is "not correctly interpreting an offset to a pointer as a signed value."
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2006-1902" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2006-04-20T10:02:00Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "fold_binary in fold-const.c in GNU Compiler Collection (gcc) 4.1 improperly handles pointer overflow when folding a certain expr comparison to a corresponding offset comparison in cases other than EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR, which might introduce buffer overflow vulnerabilities into applications that could be exploited by context-dependent attackers.NOTE: the vendor states that the essence of the issue is \"not correctly interpreting an offset to a pointer as a signed value.\"", "id": "GHSA-r8fv-8gwf-v44c", "modified": "2022-05-01T06:54:03Z", "published": "2022-05-01T06:54:03Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-1902" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356896" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01297.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01298.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fold-const.c?r1=110549\u0026r2=112698\u0026pathrev=112698\u0026diff_format=h" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431184/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431245/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431297/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431319/100/0/threaded" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.