GHSA-R8GG-JRGV-562W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:09 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:09
VLAI?
Details

Type74 ED before 4.0 misuses 128-bit ECB encryption for small files, which makes it easier for attackers to obtain plaintext data via differential cryptanalysis of a file with an original length smaller than 128 bits.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-2987"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-08-28T15:59:00Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "Type74 ED before 4.0 misuses 128-bit ECB encryption for small files, which makes it easier for attackers to obtain plaintext data via differential cryptanalysis of a file with an original length smaller than 128 bits.",
  "id": "GHSA-r8gg-jrgv-562w",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T04:09:00Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T04:09:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-2987"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN91474878/index.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://jvndb.jvn.jp/jvndb/JVNDB-2015-000119"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://type74.org/edman5-1.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://type74org.blog14.fc2.com/blog-entry-1384.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…