GHSA-R8JW-RFX3-CJ99
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 06:41 – Updated: 2022-05-01 06:41
VLAI?
Details
RITLabs The Bat! before 3.0.0.15 displays certain important headers from encapsulated data in message/partial MIME messages, instead of the real headers, which is in violation of RFC2046 header merging rules and allows remote attackers to spoof the origin of e-mail by sending a fragmented message, as demonstrated using spoofed Received: and Message-ID: headers.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-0630"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-02-10T11:02:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "RITLabs The Bat! before 3.0.0.15 displays certain important headers from encapsulated data in message/partial MIME messages, instead of the real headers, which is in violation of RFC2046 header merging rules and allows remote attackers to spoof the origin of e-mail by sending a fragmented message, as demonstrated using spoofed Received: and Message-ID: headers.",
"id": "GHSA-r8jw-rfx3-cj99",
"modified": "2022-05-01T06:41:35Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T06:41:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-0630"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24535"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0003029"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-February/041973.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18713"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.security.nnov.ru/advisories/thebatspoof.asp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424129/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16515"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…