ghsa-r965-fhrj-6v64
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:09
Modified
2022-05-14 03:09
Details

networking.c in Redis before 3.2.7 allows "Cross Protocol Scripting" because it lacks a check for POST and Host: strings, which are not valid in the Redis protocol (but commonly occur when an attack triggers an HTTP request to the Redis TCP port).

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-10517"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-10-24T18:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "networking.c in Redis before 3.2.7 allows \"Cross Protocol Scripting\" because it lacks a check for POST and Host: strings, which are not valid in the Redis protocol (but commonly occur when an attack triggers an HTTP request to the Redis TCP port).",
  "id": "GHSA-r965-fhrj-6v64",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T03:09:09Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T03:09:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-10517"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/874804da0c014a7d704b3d285aa500098a931f50"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.2/00-RELEASENOTES"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/redis/comments/5r8wxn/redis_327_is_out_important_security_fixes_inside"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101572"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.