ghsa-r965-fhrj-6v64
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:09
Modified
2022-05-14 03:09
Severity ?
Details
networking.c in Redis before 3.2.7 allows "Cross Protocol Scripting" because it lacks a check for POST and Host: strings, which are not valid in the Redis protocol (but commonly occur when an attack triggers an HTTP request to the Redis TCP port).
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-10517" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-10-24T18:29:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "networking.c in Redis before 3.2.7 allows \"Cross Protocol Scripting\" because it lacks a check for POST and Host: strings, which are not valid in the Redis protocol (but commonly occur when an attack triggers an HTTP request to the Redis TCP port).", "id": "GHSA-r965-fhrj-6v64", "modified": "2022-05-14T03:09:09Z", "published": "2022-05-14T03:09:09Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-10517" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/874804da0c014a7d704b3d285aa500098a931f50" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.2/00-RELEASENOTES" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/redis/comments/5r8wxn/redis_327_is_out_important_security_fixes_inside" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101572" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.