GHSA-R96W-3QPM-JJ6G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:30 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:30
VLAI?
Details

The ThinkServer System Manager (TSM) Baseboard Management Controller before firmware 1.27.73476 for ThinkServer RD350, RD450, RD550, RD650, and TD350 does not validate server certificates during an "encrypted remote KVM session," which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-3324"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-04-16T23:59:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The ThinkServer System Manager (TSM) Baseboard Management Controller before firmware 1.27.73476 for ThinkServer RD350, RD450, RD550, RD650, and TD350 does not validate server certificates during an \"encrypted remote KVM session,\" which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers.",
  "id": "GHSA-r96w-3qpm-jj6g",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T03:30:22Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T03:30:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-3324"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/product_security/tsm_weak_pw"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/74199"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…