GHSA-RC82-V3MM-RHJ2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-22 00:24 – Updated: 2024-04-03 23:05
VLAI?
Details
Various methods in WEBrick::HTTPRequest in Ruby 1.9.2 and 1.8.7 and earlier do not validate the X-Forwarded-For, X-Forwarded-Host and X-Forwarded-Server headers in requests, which might allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary text into log files or bypass intended address parsing via a crafted header.
Severity ?
5.3 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-3624"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-74"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-11-26T03:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Various methods in WEBrick::HTTPRequest in Ruby 1.9.2 and 1.8.7 and earlier do not validate the X-Forwarded-For, X-Forwarded-Host and X-Forwarded-Server headers in requests, which might allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary text into log files or bypass intended address parsing via a crafted header.",
"id": "GHSA-rc82-v3mm-rhj2",
"modified": "2024-04-03T23:05:34Z",
"published": "2022-04-22T00:24:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-3624"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2011-3624"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-3624"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5418"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-3624"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…