ghsa-rcgr-jhj7-cx8m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-03 03:09
Modified
2022-05-03 03:09
Details
The code for writing reg files in Samba before 2.2.8 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a race condition involving chown.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2003-0086" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2003-03-31T05:00:00Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "The code for writing reg files in Samba before 2.2.8 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a race condition involving chown.", "id": "GHSA-rcgr-jhj7-cx8m", "modified": "2022-05-03T03:09:38Z", "published": "2022-05-03T03:09:38Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-0086" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A554" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=104792646416629\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=104801012929374\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/8299" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/8303" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2003/dsa-262" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200303-11.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2003:032" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2003_016_samba.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-095.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-096.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/316165/30/25370/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/7107" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.