ghsa-rcjc-c4pj-xxrp
Vulnerability from github
A cleverly devised username might bypass LDAP authentication checks. In LDAP-authenticated Derby installations, this could let an attacker fill up the disk by creating junk Derby databases. In LDAP-authenticated Derby installations, this could also allow the attacker to execute malware which was visible to and executable by the account which booted the Derby server. In LDAP-protected databases which weren't also protected by SQL GRANT/REVOKE authorization, this vulnerability could also let an attacker view and corrupt sensitive data and run sensitive database functions and procedures.
Mitigation:
Users should upgrade to Java 21 and Derby 10.17.1.0.
Alternatively, users who wish to remain on older Java versions should build their own Derby distribution from one of the release families to which the fix was backported: 10.16, 10.15, and 10.14. Those are the releases which correspond, respectively, with Java LTS versions 17, 11, and 8.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.apache.derby:derby" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "10.1.1.0" }, { "fixed": "10.14.3" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.apache.derby:derby" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "10.15.0.0" }, { "fixed": "10.15.2.1" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.apache.derby:derby" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "10.16.0.0" }, { "fixed": "10.16.1.2" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.apache.derby:derby" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "10.17.0.0" }, { "fixed": "10.17.1.0" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2022-46337" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-74", "CWE-94" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2023-11-20T23:26:35Z", "nvd_published_at": "2023-11-20T09:15:07Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "A cleverly devised username might bypass LDAP authentication checks. In LDAP-authenticated Derby installations, this could let an attacker fill up the disk by creating junk Derby databases. In LDAP-authenticated Derby installations, this could also allow the attacker to execute malware which was visible to and executable by the account which booted the Derby server. In LDAP-protected databases which weren\u0027t also protected by SQL GRANT/REVOKE authorization, this vulnerability could also let an attacker view and corrupt sensitive data and run sensitive database functions and procedures.\n\nMitigation:\n\nUsers should upgrade to Java 21 and Derby 10.17.1.0.\n\nAlternatively, users who wish to remain on older Java versions should build their own Derby distribution from one of the release families to which the fix was backported: 10.16, 10.15, and 10.14. Those are the releases which correspond, respectively, with Java LTS versions 17, 11, and 8.", "id": "GHSA-rcjc-c4pj-xxrp", "modified": "2024-01-22T17:40:18Z", "published": "2023-11-20T09:30:31Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-46337" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/apache/derby" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7147" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/q23kvvtoohgzwybxpwozmvvk17rp0td3" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "Apache Derby: LDAP injection vulnerability in authenticator" }
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.