GHSA-RF4V-MQXP-593R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-23 21:30 – Updated: 2026-09-23 21:30Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Missing CSRF Token Verification in Storefront Product Review Submission in Easy Store extension 1.0.0-3.0.0 - The product review submission endpoint (index.php?option=com_easystore&task=product.addReview) accepted submissions without verifying an anti-CSRF token (the check had been commented out in code). An attacker could trick a logged-in user into posting unauthorized reviews or submitting review spam via cross-site requests. Resolved by enforcing Session::checkToken('request') / Session::checkToken('post') in ProductController, injecting HTMLHelper::_('form.token') into the review form template, and appending the session token to the submission payload in review-form.js.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-90900"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-23T19:19:43Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Missing CSRF Token Verification in Storefront Product Review Submission in Easy Store extension 1.0.0-3.0.0 - The product review submission endpoint (index.php?option=com_easystore\u0026task=product.addReview) accepted submissions without verifying an anti-CSRF token (the check had been commented out in code). An attacker could trick a logged-in user into posting unauthorized reviews or submitting review spam via cross-site requests. Resolved by enforcing Session::checkToken(\u0027request\u0027) / Session::checkToken(\u0027post\u0027) in ProductController, injecting HTMLHelper::_(\u0027form.token\u0027) into the review form template, and appending the session token to the submission payload in review-form.js.",
"id": "GHSA-rf4v-mqxp-593r",
"modified": "2026-09-23T21:30:41Z",
"published": "2026-09-23T21:30:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-90900"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.joomshaper.com/easystore"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.