ghsa-rhff-rv46-hwr9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:57
Modified
2022-05-14 03:57
Severity ?
Details
Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.375 and 19.x through 23.x before 23.0.0.162 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.635 on Linux allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-4277 and CVE-2016-4278, aka a "local-with-filesystem Flash sandbox bypass" issue.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-4271" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-200" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2016-09-14T18:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.375 and 19.x through 23.x before 23.0.0.162 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.635 on Linux allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-4277 and CVE-2016-4278, aka a \"local-with-filesystem Flash sandbox bypass\" issue.", "id": "GHSA-rhff-rv46-hwr9", "modified": "2022-05-14T03:57:22Z", "published": "2022-05-14T03:57:22Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-4271" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://blog.bjornweb.nl/2017/02/flash-bypassing-local-sandbox-data-exfiltration-credentials-leak" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb16-29.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201610-10" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lab.truel.it/flash-sandbox-bypass" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1865.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036791" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.