GHSA-RM75-RV3F-HQJV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:09 – Updated: 2025-04-11 04:09
VLAI?
Details

Multiple buffer overflows in ActUWzd.dll 1.0.0.1 in Mitsubishi MX Component 3, as distributed in Citect CitectFacilities 7.10 and CitectScada 7.10r1, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string, as demonstrated by a long WzTitle property value to a certain ActiveX control.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-3075"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2013-04-19T11:44:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple buffer overflows in ActUWzd.dll 1.0.0.1 in Mitsubishi MX Component 3, as distributed in Citect CitectFacilities 7.10 and CitectScada 7.10r1, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string, as demonstrated by a long WzTitle property value to a certain ActiveX control.",
  "id": "GHSA-rm75-rv3f-hqjv",
  "modified": "2025-04-11T04:09:41Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:09:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-3075"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/24886"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…