GHSA-RMVR-WMXX-583V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:16 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:16
VLAI?
Details
TippingPoint IPS before 20070710 does not properly handle a hex-encoded alternate Unicode '/' (slash) character, which might allow remote attackers to send certain network traffic and avoid detection, as demonstrated by a cmd.exe attack.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-3701"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-07-11T23:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "TippingPoint IPS before 20070710 does not properly handle a hex-encoded alternate Unicode \u0027/\u0027 (slash) character, which might allow remote attackers to send certain network traffic and avoid detection, as demonstrated by a cmd.exe attack.",
"id": "GHSA-rmvr-wmxx-583v",
"modified": "2022-05-01T18:16:26Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:16:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-3701"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/35336"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-July/064550.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/35970"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/26013"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://security-assessment.com/files/advisories/2007-07-11_Tippingpoint_IPS_Signature_Evasion.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.3com.com/securityalert/alerts/3COM-07-003.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/473311/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/24855"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018361"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/2490"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…