ghsa-rp47-7r25-f53m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:05
Modified
2022-05-14 02:05
Details
The _gnutls_ecc_ansi_x963_export function in gnutls_ecc.c in GnuTLS 3.x before 3.1.28, 3.2.x before 3.2.20, and 3.3.x before 3.3.10 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write) via a crafted (1) Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) certificate or (2) certificate signing requests (CSR), related to generating key IDs.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2014-8564", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2014-11-13T21:32:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "The _gnutls_ecc_ansi_x963_export function in gnutls_ecc.c in GnuTLS 3.x before 3.1.28, 3.2.x before 3.2.20, and 3.3.x before 3.3.10 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write) via a crafted (1) Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) certificate or (2) certificate signing requests (CSR), related to generating key IDs.", id: "GHSA-rp47-7r25-f53m", modified: "2022-05-14T02:05:35Z", published: "2022-05-14T02:05:35Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-8564", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161443", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-11/msg00084.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1846.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/59991", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/62284", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/62294", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2403-1", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.