GHSA-RPCF-RMH6-42XR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-28 21:31 – Updated: 2025-11-13 22:03
VLAI?
Summary
Netavark Has Possible DNS Resolve Confusion
Details

A vulnerability was found in the netavark package, a network stack for containers used with Podman. Due to dns.podman search domain being removed, netavark may return external servers if a valid A/AAAA record is sent as a response. When creating a container with a given name, this name will be used as the hostname for the container itself, as the podman's search domain is not added anymore the container is using the host's resolv.conf, and the DNS resolver will try to look into the search domains contained on it. If one of the domains contain a name with the same hostname as the running container, the connection will forward to unexpected external servers.

Severity ?
3.7 (Low)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "netavark"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.15.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-8283"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-15"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-07-29T19:56:11Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-28T19:15:43Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability was found in the netavark package, a network stack for containers used with Podman. Due to dns.podman search domain being removed, netavark may return external servers if a valid A/AAAA record is sent as a response. When creating a container with a given name, this name will be used as the hostname for the container itself, as the podman\u0027s search domain is not added anymore the container is using the host\u0027s resolv.conf, and the DNS resolver will try to look into the search domains contained on it. If one of the domains contain a name with the same hostname as the running container, the connection will forward to unexpected external servers.",
  "id": "GHSA-rpcf-rmh6-42xr",
  "modified": "2025-11-13T22:03:13Z",
  "published": "2025-07-28T21:31:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-8283"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/26198"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/containers/netavark/pull/1256"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/containers/netavark/commit/068abc869b736a03a947b5419c102da73830e882"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-8283"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2383941"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rpcf-rmh6-42xr"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/containers/netavark"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/containers/netavark/releases/tag/v1.15.1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Netavark Has Possible DNS Resolve Confusion "
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.